Sign-Close-Up.jpg

CSDR – Settlement Discipline

 

 

Roli Shaw (1).jpg

Roli Shaw

General Counsel and Head of FinTrU Legal

Jamie Macdonald

Vice President - Legal

Jamie MacDonald (2).jpg

Published: Tuesday 23 March 2021

 

The European Central Securities Depositories Regulation (CSDR), which entered into force on 17th September 2014, continues to present challenges for the industry as concern continues around the broad application of the settlement discipline regime. 

The aim of CSDR is to harmonise aspects of the settlement cycle and standardise requirements for Central Securities Depositories (CSDs) operating across the EU[1].  Among other things, CSDR mandates authorisation and supervision of CSDs by their National Competent Authority and introduces a shorter settlement cycle. 


The third phase of CSDR introduces a settlement discipline regime which aims to improve settlement efficiency and prevent settlement fails. Originally due to go live in September 2020, the implementation deadline has been postponed twice, primarily due to the impact of COVID-19. Currently, the deadline for implementation is 1st February 2022, however there continues to be much concern not just around the timing of the implementation, but also the application of the regime.


Summary of the key features of the settlement discipline regime


Settlement discipline is outlined in Title II of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 [2]. Obligations fall broadly into two categories – measures to prevent, and measures to address, settlement fails.  


Measures to prevent


Investment firms and professional clients are obligated to take measures to limit the number of settlement fails, including:

  • Client confirmation of the acceptance or rejection of terms in good time

  • Prompt communication of an allocation of securities to the transaction

  • Investment firm to confirm receipt of confirmation and allocation messages

 

Measures to address


CSDs shall establish a system to monitor settlement fails and provide regular reports to the competent authority. In addition, failing participants shall be subject to cash penalties, and a mandatory buy-in process is introduced:

 

  • Cash penalties calculated and applied daily until settlement or conclusion of buy-in process

  • Buy-in process initiated following the relevant ‘extension period’. Whereas buy-ins are typically an optional remedy, they will be mandatory under the settlement discipline regime.

European Commission consultation

 
To address the ongoing industry concern about its broad application, in December 2020 the EC launched a targeted consultation on the implementation of CSDR. Feedback was sought on a range of areas to ensure objectives are met in a “more proportionate, efficient and effective manner" [3]. Of the 42 questions, six invited feedback on specific aspects of the settlement discipline regime. 


Industry bodies and participants continue to express concern at the potential consequences of the regime. There has been particular industry scrutiny on the mandatory nature of buy-ins, the lack of a pass-on mechanism, and the need to instruct a buy-in agent. 


ICMA’s response to the consultation focused on mandatory buy-ins, predicting damage to EU bond market pricing and liquidity, increased costs for investors and issuers, and the potential for further destabilisation in times of market turmoil [4].

 

ICMA has also requested greater flexibility on the buy-in agent requirement and called for the incorporation of a pass-on mechanism which is critical to support circumstances where there is a chain of linked securities transactions and a fail in one would trigger the mandatory buy in process for all subsequent transactions in the chain.


ISDA and the FIA once more highlighted the “detrimental effects” of mandatory buy-ins for derivatives markets. They continue to lobby for the exclusion of margin transfers (arguing this introduces more risk to derivative counterparties), physically settled derivatives and emission allowances from the buy-in rules [5]. 


With any proposed amendments to the settlement discipline regime not expected until Q2 2021 at the earliest, and final amendments unlikely to be published before Q4 2021, the 1st February 2022 implementation deadline is under threat. Nevertheless, consistent across the market is the view that sweeping changes to the rules are improbable and unduly optimistic. This could pose a very significant remediation burden on market participants who currently have high regulatory remediation workloads around IBOR transition and the next phases of the Uncleared Margin Rules.


Remediation strategy


The regime is broad in nature. All parties involved in the European securities markets (including those based outside the EEA) will be impacted. There is a risk that banks, securities firms and asset managers based outside Europe will be caught off guard by the regime.


Ongoing market uncertainty around the scope and substance of the rules has led to a divided industry approach. While some firms await further clarity from regulators, others are stepping up preparations to implement rules fundamentally consistent with those currently published and the February 2022 deadline is, as yet, unmoved.


Implementing the settlement discipline regime will require extensive bilateral contract remediation, with securities repurchase transactions, securities lending transactions and derivatives heavily impacted. CSDR will further stretch firms already tackling IBOR transition and the final phases of the uncleared margin rules. The potential for parties to overlook their obligations coupled with the ongoing uncertainty over the rules calls for timely preparation.
 

TrU Delivery - Blue.png

FinTrU Offering


FinTrU has a proven track record delivering large-scale regulatory remediation projects in the Financial Services industry. FinTrU provides an end-to-end solution combining operational and legal resources, with extensive experience using leading technologies to assist its clients with their delivery on large-scale remediation and regulatory projects. 


FinTrU has extensive experience in migrating client processes and delivering complex regulatory change projects from our UK delivery centres. Flexible engagement models from staff augmentation through to fully managed service allows FinTrU to provide a skilled, efficient and cost-effective solution to regulatory change challenges. 


While the regulator considers the case for an extension to the settlement discipline deadline, FinTrU has begun working with clients to analyse and scope remediation efforts. By working early to establish a methodology, Quality Plan, templates and tooling, FinTrU is helping to put firms in a strong position to meet their obligations under the rules. 

To find out how FinTrU can help you prepare, please contact the FinTrU Business Development team.

Roli Shaw (1).jpg

Roli Shaw

General Counsel and Head of FinTrU Legal

Read Profile

Jamie MacDonald (2).jpg

Jamie Macdonald

Vice President - Legal

About FinTrU

Founded in December 2013, FinTrU is a multi‐award winning RegTech company in the Financial Services sector that is committed to giving local talent the opportunity to work on the global stage with the largest International Investment Banks. FinTrU works with clients to design solutions to help them meet their regulatory obligations in areas such as Legal, Risk, Compliance, KYC, Operations, Consultancy and Technology. FinTrU’s clients are all global Investment Banks, based in North America, Europe and Asia and the company’s business model is to provide technology enabled solutions to clients to augment and support their existing internal functions.

References

[1] ESMA, Settlement, https://www.esma.europa.eu/regulation/post-trading/settlement


[2] REGULATION (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council


of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories,
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02014R0909-20160701

[3] Targeted consultation on the review of Regulation on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories, https://ec.europa.eu/info/consultations/finance-2020-csdr-review_en

[4] ICMA submits its response to the Targeted consultation on the review of CSDR, https://www.icmagroup.org/News/news-in-brief/icma-submits-its-response-to-the-targeted-consultation-on-the-review-of-csdr/

[5] ISDA Responds to European Commission Consultation on the Review of CSDR, 
https://www.isda.org/2021/02/02/isda-responds-to-european-commission-consultation-on-the-review-of-csdr/